Where Do We Go From Here?

The Scottish referendum has upset the applecart of British politics, and the fact we came dangerously close to the breakup of the UK has sent shockwaves through a complacent Westminster establishment. And it’s about time too.

As Fish eloquently explained in a long and heartfelt blog post, this is not really about Scottish nationalism at all. It’s a crisis of democratic legitimacy affecting the whole of the UK. We had a series of administrations, both Conservative and Labour who have become increasingly remote from the people who elected them, and care more about the financial markets than the voters. While “The Markets” are described as if they’re some impartial force of nature, they actually represent a small number of extremely rich people who do not like democracy. The failure to prosecute a single high-ranking banker for fraud in the wake of the 2008 banking crisis and instead impose a punishing austerity regime squeezing the living standards of the most vulnerable shows where Westminster’s priorities lie.

The mood in the country is that things cannot go on like this. Where we go from here is an interesting question. There is a lot of talk of constitutional reform, of increased powers not only to Scotland but to the English regions and big cities, and presumably to Wales. And if electoral reform isn’t also high on the agenda, it really ought to be.

But tinkering with administrative structures or electoral systems isn’t the only issue, since the crisis of legitimacy goes far deeper. There is a media that exists within a Westminster bubble, and gives the impression it’s on the side of the politicians rather than the people. And then there is the Labour Party which had adopted the same neo-liberal agenda and become indistinguishable from the Tories in any meaningful sense. This means we’re denied any real choice even if we’re fortunate to live in one of the small number of marginal constituencies where our votes actually matter.

With nobody to offer an alternative vision of a better, more hopeful world that isn’t ruled by unelected bankers, the only other vision on offer is UKIP’s fear-driven swivel-eyed xenophobia.

And we need something better than that.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Where Do We Go From Here?

  1. Michael says:

    Agreed, we need to address the democraitc deficit.

    I also agree we need better than fear-driven swivel-eyed xenophobia, but I’m not sure the EU will reform itself to the point that it is worth staying in it. All politicians will say that decisions should be taken at the lowest possible level. Almost all politicians will say the lowest possible level is the one at which they hold office and I have yet to notice the UKIP MEPs actually doing anything about moving powers back to the member states.

    I note that the Labour Party are not interested in an English Parliament. I do not see how they can justify the devolution of further powers to Scotland without one.

    It is true that there is no easy answer to “The West Lothian Question”. If there was one it would have been implemented by now. However, it is now time to find a hard answer.