<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What now for the Liberal Democrats?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/what-now-for-the-liberal-democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/what-now-for-the-liberal-democrats/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ard sloc</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/what-now-for-the-liberal-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-69823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ard sloc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 13:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=12624#comment-69823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I share you pain, Tim, but I have been there before: when the number of MPs was cut to five, of whom two were elected through pacts with the Tories in two-member cities.  Even then, though, there was an active student membership working on all sorts of policy ideas and local workers getting people elected on to local councils.

You are so right about the loss of the tactical votes we had taken from Labour, but there was always &quot;a plague on all your houses&quot; ragbag of votes, many of which will have been sucked-up by the Faragist&#039;s.  In truth, Liberal party activists have  included some with no real political principles but a desire to be a big fish in a small pool.    

Clegg&#039;s leadership in government was poor - interesting that most of the party heavyweights did not have ministerial office - and his General Election centrist stance cut no ice.  Liberals and Liberal Democrats have appealed to left-of-centre opinion since at least the time of Jo Grimond.     

Our old friend John Clark has reminded us that there is still a Liberal Party, with representation on local councils.  Now that Clegg, as well as Huhne, has gone from leadership a reconciliation might be possible.  You are right about the ground on which revival should be based.  Fifty/sixty seats may not be possible again, but a fighting party that can&#039;t be ignored will rise once more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share you pain, Tim, but I have been there before: when the number of MPs was cut to five, of whom two were elected through pacts with the Tories in two-member cities.  Even then, though, there was an active student membership working on all sorts of policy ideas and local workers getting people elected on to local councils.</p>
<p>You are so right about the loss of the tactical votes we had taken from Labour, but there was always &#8220;a plague on all your houses&#8221; ragbag of votes, many of which will have been sucked-up by the Faragist&#8217;s.  In truth, Liberal party activists have  included some with no real political principles but a desire to be a big fish in a small pool.    </p>
<p>Clegg&#8217;s leadership in government was poor &#8211; interesting that most of the party heavyweights did not have ministerial office &#8211; and his General Election centrist stance cut no ice.  Liberals and Liberal Democrats have appealed to left-of-centre opinion since at least the time of Jo Grimond.     </p>
<p>Our old friend John Clark has reminded us that there is still a Liberal Party, with representation on local councils.  Now that Clegg, as well as Huhne, has gone from leadership a reconciliation might be possible.  You are right about the ground on which revival should be based.  Fifty/sixty seats may not be possible again, but a fighting party that can&#8217;t be ignored will rise once more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/what-now-for-the-liberal-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-69820</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 07:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=12624#comment-69820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice piece. I agree with your views about the identity of the main parties. The need for a more representative electoral system is clear (even if it does mean UKIP get represented). I have never hidden my politics, I am and always will be left of centre. My worry is that the Labour Party in its desire to get back into power will try to emulate the Tory lite model of Blair.  
Fundamentally the result of this election was once again decided not on policies but on fear. The media constantly pushed the argument that labour was just a vote for SNP. It was interesting how the main parties all fought for a United Kingdom but we&#039;re against any Scottish voices in parliament.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice piece. I agree with your views about the identity of the main parties. The need for a more representative electoral system is clear (even if it does mean UKIP get represented). I have never hidden my politics, I am and always will be left of centre. My worry is that the Labour Party in its desire to get back into power will try to emulate the Tory lite model of Blair.<br />
Fundamentally the result of this election was once again decided not on policies but on fear. The media constantly pushed the argument that labour was just a vote for SNP. It was interesting how the main parties all fought for a United Kingdom but we&#8217;re against any Scottish voices in parliament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
