<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tide has Turned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/the-tide-has-turned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/the-tide-has-turned/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/the-tide-has-turned/comment-page-1/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=538#comment-1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow I didn&#039;t think you&#039;d agree with my assessment :)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I didn&#8217;t think you&#8217;d agree with my assessment <img src='http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/the-tide-has-turned/comment-page-1/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phelps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=538#comment-1031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that you are vastly underestimating the Jacksonian legacy in America.  To think that this is a swipe againt &quot;dick-swinging macho posturing&quot; is as off-base as thinking that the 2000 election was a ratification of Clinton&#039;s impeachment.

The republicans lost because they had become distasteful to republicans.  They out-spent the Democrats, out-socialized medicined the Democrats (Medicare prescrptions) and out-amnestyed the Democrats on border control.

I really don&#039;t think it will be that turbublent.  I don&#039;t see the Sky-is-falling scenarios (impeachment, constant investigations, Iraq cut&amp;run, etc) happening because any of those would pretty much hand the White House to any serious Republican contender in &#039;08, and the Democrats are smarter than that.  (I hope.  It really sucks to lose to a dumbass.)

And as for the war-crimes &quot;hope&quot;, all I can say is I hope y&#039;all belly up and give it a try.  We&#039;re your huckleberry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that you are vastly underestimating the Jacksonian legacy in America.  To think that this is a swipe againt &#8220;dick-swinging macho posturing&#8221; is as off-base as thinking that the 2000 election was a ratification of Clinton&#8217;s impeachment.</p>
<p>The republicans lost because they had become distasteful to republicans.  They out-spent the Democrats, out-socialized medicined the Democrats (Medicare prescrptions) and out-amnestyed the Democrats on border control.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t think it will be that turbublent.  I don&#8217;t see the Sky-is-falling scenarios (impeachment, constant investigations, Iraq cut&#038;run, etc) happening because any of those would pretty much hand the White House to any serious Republican contender in &#8217;08, and the Democrats are smarter than that.  (I hope.  It really sucks to lose to a dumbass.)</p>
<p>And as for the war-crimes &#8220;hope&#8221;, all I can say is I hope y&#8217;all belly up and give it a try.  We&#8217;re your huckleberry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
