<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Reactionaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/the-new-reactionaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/the-new-reactionaries/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poindexter</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/the-new-reactionaries/comment-page-1/#comment-38606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poindexter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9248#comment-38606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re on to something in the last paragraph. Far Left and Far Right can switch, but they tend to retain some characteristics in the flip. Globalists will still be globalists, universalists won&#039;t suddenly become localists, radicals will stay radical and not become pragmatic, and the intolerant, judgmental, impositional, and authoritarian will all tend to stay those ways. Also, those who see the world in materialist/economic terms will also tend to stick to that piece of their worldview.

What you might not expect as a result of this fact, however, is that one can become a Right-wing liberal, or a Left-wing conservative. The latter I am just supposing for the sake of symmetry; I don&#039;t actually have evidence of it, but I am familiar with the Right-wing liberal, if only because I am one.

I was a left-of-center liberal for much of my life, and a firebrand one (paradoxically, a fiery moderate) from 1997-2006 or so. I began a political conversion in about 2010, but retained my adherence to moderation that kept me from joining the ranks of the Far Left previously. A Right-wing liberal, to me, is one who eschews the materialists&#039; aspirations and priorities -- does not forsake the religious, cultural, and ethnic for the material/economic -- but does not give up on the ideal of freedom of personal and artistic expression as paramount for a (Western) society&#039;s well-being.

It is, perhaps, a rejection of Trotskyist world domination, but it also rejects the root of such thought in Europe: Christian humanism, universalism, and proselytisation.

Perhaps it&#039;s a crooked line through a muddled plane of sociopolitical dots, clumps, and empty spaces, but I perceive some way forward, and around, the many and sundry seemingly intractable hangups in our current political climate.

Keep on the lookout for the Right-wing liberal in the future. I doubt it will become a major political phenomenon any time soon, but hopefully at least a blip on the radar here and there.

PS I often use AD&amp;D alignments to make sense of real world moral and political positioning. Sometimes it&#039;s an invaluable model.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re on to something in the last paragraph. Far Left and Far Right can switch, but they tend to retain some characteristics in the flip. Globalists will still be globalists, universalists won&#8217;t suddenly become localists, radicals will stay radical and not become pragmatic, and the intolerant, judgmental, impositional, and authoritarian will all tend to stay those ways. Also, those who see the world in materialist/economic terms will also tend to stick to that piece of their worldview.</p>
<p>What you might not expect as a result of this fact, however, is that one can become a Right-wing liberal, or a Left-wing conservative. The latter I am just supposing for the sake of symmetry; I don&#8217;t actually have evidence of it, but I am familiar with the Right-wing liberal, if only because I am one.</p>
<p>I was a left-of-center liberal for much of my life, and a firebrand one (paradoxically, a fiery moderate) from 1997-2006 or so. I began a political conversion in about 2010, but retained my adherence to moderation that kept me from joining the ranks of the Far Left previously. A Right-wing liberal, to me, is one who eschews the materialists&#8217; aspirations and priorities &#8212; does not forsake the religious, cultural, and ethnic for the material/economic &#8212; but does not give up on the ideal of freedom of personal and artistic expression as paramount for a (Western) society&#8217;s well-being.</p>
<p>It is, perhaps, a rejection of Trotskyist world domination, but it also rejects the root of such thought in Europe: Christian humanism, universalism, and proselytisation.</p>
<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s a crooked line through a muddled plane of sociopolitical dots, clumps, and empty spaces, but I perceive some way forward, and around, the many and sundry seemingly intractable hangups in our current political climate.</p>
<p>Keep on the lookout for the Right-wing liberal in the future. I doubt it will become a major political phenomenon any time soon, but hopefully at least a blip on the radar here and there.</p>
<p>PS I often use AD&amp;D alignments to make sense of real world moral and political positioning. Sometimes it&#8217;s an invaluable model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulE</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/the-new-reactionaries/comment-page-1/#comment-35134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9248#comment-35134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recall this doing the rounds a few years back (link to actual site on wiki article for anyone who wants to try the test questions)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_compass]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall this doing the rounds a few years back (link to actual site on wiki article for anyone who wants to try the test questions)</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_compass" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_compass</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
