Uncategorized Blog

Where are the defenders of western liberal values?

Great post by Jonathan Calder on Liberal England in response to the appalling front page of The Guardian following the Woolwich murder, and the equally awful coverage by the BBC.

Almost as depressing as the Guardian front page was the discussion of the Woolwich murder on Newsnight yesterday evening. One participant, the impressive Maajid Nawaz, spoke of the need for a Western narrative to challenge the world-view of Islamism. But you only had to look at the people with him to see there was little chance we would hear it last night.

There was John Reid who, as a Communist while the Soviet Union was the greatest tyranny on this planet, never bought into the Western narrative in the first place and is now employed by the security industry – though Newsnight never reminds of us during his frequent appearances. And there was Alex Carlile, a Liberal Democrat who long ago threw in his lot with the most repressive elements of Labourism.

It seems that the so-called liberal media is not giving nearly enough airtime to defending the values of western liberal democracy, instead giving a soapbox to people like the ridiculous Anjem Choudary  or the totalitarian thug John Reid. While at the same time the usual suspects ranging from white supremacists to militant athiests are using the whole thing to peddle their predicatable message of hate.

It’s all very depressing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

UKIP plays Whack-a-Mole with Uncle Jimmys

The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin seems to have anticipated the rise of UKIP way back in the 1970s.

Barely a day goes by without a UKIP candidate somewhere in the country spouting extremist bollocks that makes nonsense of any pretence of their being a grown-up party that isn’t part of the far right. In the past few days we’ve had a sexist troglodyte from Yorkshire claiming that no self-respecting businessman would employ a woman of child-bearing age. Then we had another who appears to be deeply into anti-Semitic tinfoil-hat conspiracy theories. Now we have a 19th century time-traveller claiming that physical exercise prevents you from becoming gay. Who will be the next, and what nonsense will they come up with?

Yes, it’s true that the party keeps sacking these candidates. But as soon as they do, another one pops up, and another, and another. It’s like a game of Whack-a-Mole. It does leave you with the impression that the party is awash with Uncle Jimmy characters, and they’re not even remotely good at screening out these wingnuts as election candidates.

It does leave you with the impression that these racist, sexist numpties represent the party’s base.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Goodbye to The Iron Lady

She’s only been in Hell a couple of days and she’s shut down three furnaces and privatised the Lake of Fire already!

Margaret Thatcher. A third of the nation loved her. Another third hated everything she stood for with a passion. And the remaining third is too young to understand why the rest us feel the way we do.

I was never a supporter. I found her intensely tribal style of class-based identity politics loathsome and dangerous, and hated the way she acted as if half the country were enemies to be defeated.

Some on the right are invoking “Do not speak ill of the dead” when anyone dares to mention anything on the debit column of her balance sheet. But Glenn Greenwald in The Guardian explains why that is only appropriate for private individuals, and should not apply to public figures, especially those as divisive and polarising as Thatcher. To allow her supporters and ideological heirs to heap unconditional praise while insisting that their political opponents remain silent out of respect is itself a highly political position, something many on the right seem unwilling to acknowledge.

There was certainly no love for her in Scotland, and Scottish writer Charlie Stross does not mince his words in response to the sort of uncritical praise I’ve seen coming from one or two right-wing Americans.

I’d like to remind non-Brits that strong leaders are more popular abroad than in their home land, because foreigners don’t get to see the skulls that were smashed in the process of building that reputation for “strength”.

The resulting comments thread contains some interesting discussion of Britain’s post-war industrial problems for which Thatcherism was supposed to have been the solution.

The funeral arrangements show that Thatcher is as controversial in death as she was in life. The Telegraph’s Peter Oborne eloquently describes why giving Thatcher a state funeral in all but name dangerously undermines the political neutrality of the monarchy, and is a very bad thing for democracy. A poster on Twitter made the very good point that an extravagant public event for such a partisan figure is the sort of thing that’s expected from a tin-pot dictatorship rather than a mature democracy. Charlie Stross (again) risks invoking Godwin’s Law by making direct comparisons with Nuremberg rallies.

I’m very glad to be overseas for the next week and a half. I fully expected Cameron et al to use the Maggon’s funeral as a rallying point for their clan, but I wasn’t expecting a full-blown Nuremberg Rally. Disgraceful.

Can’t say I disagree with that. Not that I want to condone or encourage rioting, but large scale public unrest would be as appropriate a memorial to Thatcher as what’s being described above.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off

Job Vacancy – Must Speak Fluent Bollocks

Can you speak fluent management bollocks? Would you like to draw a £60k+ salary in a role where the job description gives no clue as to how the position will benefit the people whose taxes will pay your salary? Well, Blaby District Council have just the job for you!

Seriously, we hear about high salary “non-jobs” in national and local government which get the reputation for being awarded to cronies of the ruling party. This post of “Director of Place” sounds suspiciously like one of those. Seriously, even the job title gives no clue as to what the purpose of the post is supposed to be for.  Maybe I’m just being cynical, and the “Director of Place” will perform a vital role in the delivery of services to the people of Blaby. But I’m not convinced.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Representative Democracy’s Failure Mode

Author Charlie Stross talks of the beige dictatorship much of the developed world seems to be living under.

For a while I’ve had the unwelcome feeling that we’re living under occupation by Martian invaders. (Not just here in the UK, but everyone, everywhere on the planet.) Something has gone wrong with our political processes, on a global scale. But what? It’s obviously subtle — we haven’t been on the receiving end of a bunch of jack-booted fascists or their communist equivalents organizing putsches. But we’ve somehow slid into a developed-world global-scale quasi-police state, with drone strikes and extraordinary rendition and unquestioned but insane austerity policies being rammed down our throats, government services being outsourced, peaceful protesters being pepper-sprayed, tased, or even killed, police spying on political dissidents becoming normal, and so on. What’s happening?

Stross goes on to highlight the way the Equal Marriage bill passed precisely because no powerful vested interests stand to lose from it, and it gives the government a veneer of progressivism. But we’re unlikely to see any movement on the war on drugs, no matter how much human misery it causes, because the vested interests in the status quo are so powerful.

Tony Benn once said that our fate is now in the hands of bankers we did not elect, and cannot remove. Whatever you think of Tony Benn, it is clear that corporate interests, not the people, increasingly set the political agenda. It’s almost impossible to see equivalents of the large-scale social reforms by Liberal and Labour governments in the first half of the 20th century happening under today’s political systems. Indeed, many of those achievements are now being dismantled to the benefit of corporate interests against the wishes of the majority of the electorate. How many people actually voted to break up and privatise the NHS, for example?

When disparities in wealth in the USA have reached the levels of pre-revolutionary France, I can’t see how the situation is remotely sustainable, no matter what amount of bread and circuses. Hopefully the western world can avoid something as traumatic as the French Revolution, but the democracy isn’t performing the self-correcting function it’s supposed to.

I believe voting on it’s own will change nothing, and representative democracy will only start delivering governments that actually reflect the will and interests of the people after the real battle has been won elsewhere.

The internet may turn out to be a major battleground, as it provides a way around the corporate media. This is one reason why power-grabs like SOPA need to be resisted. The stakes are far, far higher than protecting the entertainment industries against “piracy”. If the web devolves into a cross between cable TV and a shopping mall, with other voices silenced or marginalised, that field of battle will be lost.

What do you think?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off

The Equal Marriage Bill

I am getting fed up with the line taken by so many of the opponents of the equal marriage bill currently being debated in the House of Commons. I know that political and religious reactionaries always claim to speak for far more people than they actually do, but I do take strong exception to their claims to speak for all Christians. They do not speak for me.

The religious right’s cherry-picking of out-of-context Bible quotes to justify homophobia remind me a lot of the Dutch Reformed Church of South Africa during the years of Apartheid. There are plenty of Old Testament verses than can be used to justify racism. Yet the overwhelming majority of churches today reject such interpretations, whatever positions they may have held in the past. Most famously the Dutch Reformed Church has publicly atoned for it’s support for Apartheid and declared it’s previous position as heretical. I fail to be convinced that one notorious verse in Leviticus is any different.

As for the ridiculous argument that equal marriage equates to some form of persecution of Christians, I suggest those making that claim go and speak to a few representatives of Pakistan’s beleaguered Christian minority, and learn what genuine persecution really means.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off

Leave the EU? No thanks.

The best argument in favour of continued UK membership of the EU is to look at agenda of the people who want us to leave. The vast majority of them are ideologues of the hard right, with a few hard-leftists and a rather larger group of borderline racist swivel-eyed xenophobes.

What they all have in common is a vision of Britain that is not the sort of country I want to live in. They’re all people for whom any form of social democracy is anathema.

The Tory right tend to keep quiet about their future Britain without all those pesky EU regulations and nonsense about worker’s rights. As quoted in Jonathan Calder’s blog:

Kwasi Kwarteng, Priti Patel, Dominic Raab, Chris Skidmore and Elizabeth Truss, who are all seen as rising stars on the right of the party, describe British workers as among the “worst idlers” in the world, and urge David Cameron to reform work places along the lines of the Asian, rather than the European model.

Yes, they look forward to a nation in which people work far longer hours in much poorer conditions in order to be competitive with the sweatshops of the far-east.

Yes, the Barclay Brothers, the Rothermere family and the pornographer who owns the Daily Express churn out anti-EU propaganda in the newspapers they own, like Britain’s very own version of America’s Koch brothers, and people fall for their simplistic populism.

But read the above quote and ask yourself: Is the Britain they want really the sort of country you want to live in?

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Where The Sun Don’t Shine

A man called Geoffrey Nunberg has been working on a Unified Theory of Assholes. We’re talking the vulgar epithet used to describe a certain type of individual, of course.

After all, assholes have been around for ages—even if the word’s figurative use is modern. (It was soldier slang during World War II.) But something has changed. Consider Donald Trump, an unquestioned asshole in the eyes of James and Nunberg. The attention our culture pays to self-absorbed buffoons is for James evidence that assholery is on the rise. “Our narcissistic age thus might help explain why assholes seem to be everywhere of late.” Nunberg takes it a step further, noting that every era has its emblematic scoundrel: Once it was the cad, later it was the phony, today it is the asshole.

Nunberg identifies their defining characteristic, on top of the obvious self-centered amorality, to be an inflated sense of entitlement. He comes to the conclusion that not only are they increasing, but they’re taking over the world, using their influence in business and politics to corrode the institutions society needs in order to function.

“Society becomes awash with people who are defensively unwilling to accept the burdens of cooperative life, out of a righteous sense that they deserve ever more.”

The result: Living standards rise for only a few; political power is concentrated in the hands of a minority, whose members change the rules to protect their own interests; and “liberty,” “opportunity,” and “prosperity” devolve into platitudes.

Indeed.

As an aside, it’s remarkable how many “self-made entrepreneurs” who insist on pulling the rug from beneath everyone else and delare that people must pull themselves up by their own bootstraps turn out to have been beneficiaries of large inheritances. One wonders just how far many of them would have got had it not been for Daddy’s money. I can imagine some of them not lasting long in jobs that involves saying “Do you want fries with that” before their sense of entitlement gets them fired…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off

Newport Connecticut

Yet another pointless mass killing in America.

There are cries that “we must not politicise the tragedy”. Well, bollocks to that. “Don’t politicise” is just a code word for “Don’t talk about gun control at a time when people are listening”.

The truth is that, yet again, those who have successfully lobbied against every attempt to make it harder for people with untreated mental health problems to obtain military-style assault weapons have blood on their hands. The sort of weapons that enable psychotics to massacre large numbers of people have no use for hunting or self-defence. They are weapons of war. Elements of the rightwing gun lobby want the power to wage war on against their own nation. There is a word for that, and that word is “Terrorist”.

The ugly truth is that too many of the gun lobby would rather see dead children than give up on their fantasies of armed insurrection. They won’t say that out loud, of course, hence the ritual hogwash of “This tragedy would have been prevented if only we arm every kindergarten teacher in the land”.

As Teresa Nielsen Hayden said on Twitter “Americans love owning guns because it lets them pretend their safety isn’t a function of our shared society. They should grow up”. If you have to arm kindergarten teachers, you live in a failed state. In such an arms race, the only winners are the gun manufacturers, who are laughing all the way to the bank. Guess where most of the NRA’s funds come from?

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

The Christian Right – Neither Christian nor right?

I’ve often thought that large sections of the US religious right were about as Christian as the fictional “Golden Promise Ministries” in Charles Stross’ recent novel “The Apocalypse Codex“. No spoilers, but given that the novel is set in a world influence by H.P.Lovecraft I think you can fill in the blanks…

This quote from commenter “mds” in a very long post-election thread in Making Light. discussing the meltdowns of so many people on the American right seems to confirm at lot of this:

There are currently large swathes of fundamentalist Christianity who now embrace the Tim LaHaye-esque view that the Sermon on the Mount is only a description of the Millenial Kingdom, not a prescription for current Christian behavior. Most of the Gospels are largely ignored by my own fundamentalist family members, who are almost exclusive concerned with that one infamous verse from Leviticus; a patchwork quilt of prophetic material from Daniel, Ezekiel, and Revelation; the most odious excerpts from Paul’s epistles; and an utterly unsourced hysteria about abortion, which fundamentalist Protestants didn’t give two shits about until the late seventies at the earliest. Heck, the only part of 1 Corinthians 13 they seem to have taken to heart is a little piece of verse 7: “believeth all things.” The motto of a Fox News viewer.

So to me, the current substantial overlap between Birchers, Objectivists and fundamentalist Christians is explained by the fact that too many fundamentalist “Christians” aren’t actually Christians any more, in any meaningful sense of the term. It’s been reduced purely to a tribal marker.

Ah yes, Tim LaHaye. If you’ve read any of Fred Clark’s extensive dissection of “Left Behind” you’ll realise this best-selling series of terribly-written hack novels not only preaches something far removed from orthodox mainstream Christianity, but has a malign grip on America’s religious and political life. LaHaye and the writers and preachers that influenced him, such as Hal Lindsay, Cyrus Scofield and John Darby have constructed a theology of their own out of the whole cloth that has little or nothing to do with traditional Christian belief at all. As Teresa Neilsen Hayden points out further down the comment thread:

It’s stupendously heretical — a break with almost all previous Christian belief and interpretation — but it does explain a lot.

More liberal Christians are reluctant to use the word “Heresy”. It’s been too often used as a term of abuse by fundamentalists aimed at anyone that disagrees with their sometimes over-literalist reading of scripture. But for any dogma that ignores Christ’s teachings in the Gospels entirely, let alone invents an entirely imaginary Gospel According to Ayn Rand, there’s really no other word to use.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off