<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mainstream Tropes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/mainstream-tropes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/mainstream-tropes/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/mainstream-tropes/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=511#comment-985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exploding planets every ten pages, of course!  What else did you think I meant?

More seriously, though, I find too many &#039;mainstream&#039; novels frustratingly slow-moving, and it sometimes seems to take half the book before anything resembling a plot emerges.  

Some mainstream works by authors who also write SF have suffered badly from this; even Iain (without the M) Banks has been guilty of it.  Prime example has to be &#039;Song of Stone&#039;, that reads like a short story padded out to the length of a novel.

My whole post is really a rant at the sort of rather tedious stuff that always seems to win the major literary prizes, and the sniffy distain with which the literati dismiss anything that doesn&#039;t fit their narrow definition on what a novel should be about.  

Which is exactly the same as the music critics who believe one-dimensional three-chord indie rock is the only acceptable form for contemporary music.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exploding planets every ten pages, of course!  What else did you think I meant?</p>
<p>More seriously, though, I find too many &#8216;mainstream&#8217; novels frustratingly slow-moving, and it sometimes seems to take half the book before anything resembling a plot emerges.  </p>
<p>Some mainstream works by authors who also write SF have suffered badly from this; even Iain (without the M) Banks has been guilty of it.  Prime example has to be &#8216;Song of Stone&#8217;, that reads like a short story padded out to the length of a novel.</p>
<p>My whole post is really a rant at the sort of rather tedious stuff that always seems to win the major literary prizes, and the sniffy distain with which the literati dismiss anything that doesn&#8217;t fit their narrow definition on what a novel should be about.  </p>
<p>Which is exactly the same as the music critics who believe one-dimensional three-chord indie rock is the only acceptable form for contemporary music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serdar</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/sf-and-gaming/sf/mainstream-tropes/comment-page-1/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Serdar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=511#comment-984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question is, what do you define as &quot;action&quot;?  A person coming to a decison isn&#039;t really action, but if he *acts* on it, that&#039;s action (i.e., &quot;Mrs. Dalloway&quot;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, what do you define as &#8220;action&#8221;?  A person coming to a decison isn&#8217;t really action, but if he *acts* on it, that&#8217;s action (i.e., &#8220;Mrs. Dalloway&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
