<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Codes of Conduct Go Bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/rants/when-codes-of-conduct-go-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/rants/when-codes-of-conduct-go-bad/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/rants/when-codes-of-conduct-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-80487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=16539#comment-80487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve noticed the &quot;*ism is Prejudice+Power&quot; line only ever comes out to defend someone who&#039;s said something bigotted. 

To be fair, I have never seen any actual real code of conduct contain a line like the one quoted above, even for organisations with strong &quot;social justice&quot; values. I would assume any competent organisation wouldn&#039;t publish a code of conduct without first running it past a lawyer, and no competent lawyer would let a clause like that through. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed the &#8220;*ism is Prejudice+Power&#8221; line only ever comes out to defend someone who&#8217;s said something bigotted. </p>
<p>To be fair, I have never seen any actual real code of conduct contain a line like the one quoted above, even for organisations with strong &#8220;social justice&#8221; values. I would assume any competent organisation wouldn&#8217;t publish a code of conduct without first running it past a lawyer, and no competent lawyer would let a clause like that through. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synthetase</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/rants/when-codes-of-conduct-go-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-80486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Synthetase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 08:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=16539#comment-80486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate the &#039;reverse&#039; prefix. &#039;Reverse&#039; racism is just racism. Ditto &#039;reverse&#039; sexism or reverse any other -ism. When people use those terms it tells me they&#039;re more interested in making themselves feel good than in genuinely addressing issues of discrimination.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the &#8216;reverse&#8217; prefix. &#8216;Reverse&#8217; racism is just racism. Ditto &#8216;reverse&#8217; sexism or reverse any other -ism. When people use those terms it tells me they&#8217;re more interested in making themselves feel good than in genuinely addressing issues of discrimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
