<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Farce Continues.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/the-farce-continues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/the-farce-continues/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/the-farce-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=63#comment-71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not just that when you close down branch lines if has a knock on effect to main lines as there might be a few people at branch line station say 50 branch line stations and 20 ppl at peak times. But 50 times 20 is 1,000 ppl. That is 4 loads worth of trains. It just does not make sense and proves that the government has still got the short sighted rail policy inherited from Beeching. Lets be hypothetical and mask Beeching&#8217;s findings onto the road network. My cul de sac i live in only has about 50 car journeys a day. On my main road there are 7,000 cars roaring every day. On my main orad the A22 there are tens if not hundreds of thousands. Pn the M25 well I&#039;ll let you guess. So lets close down all the closes and cul de sac and all the little used roads in the countryside lets close them down as if they were never built in the first place. What do you think this would do to car usage? In fact this is a good idea. I&#039;m fed up with one method being applied to one form of transport with another for another form of transport. 

This is nothing more than tinkering so the government can have more control still blame private companies and put its cronies in charge to rip-off the taxpayer. It will never change so get used to it. 

It&#8217;s obvious vertical integration works for the rail industry because historically that&#8217;s how are railways were ran for over a hundred years. The SR, LNER, GWR etc&#8230; In Japan when they privatised their industry which was also nationalised like ours in the 40&#8217;s or whenever. The only difference is Japan has proper companies not franchises. It doesn&#8217;t have a separate infrastructure company that that of TOC&#8217;s 

What is totally unacceptable is nopt the fact that our system was wrong but the complete inability of the government to do anything about it. This truly leads me to believe the government wants it like this so its cronies are in charge and can then pay themselves telephone number bonuses because they&#8217;ve improved performance by 1% or something.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just that when you close down branch lines if has a knock on effect to main lines as there might be a few people at branch line station say 50 branch line stations and 20 ppl at peak times. But 50 times 20 is 1,000 ppl. That is 4 loads worth of trains. It just does not make sense and proves that the government has still got the short sighted rail policy inherited from Beeching. Lets be hypothetical and mask Beeching&#8217;s findings onto the road network. My cul de sac i live in only has about 50 car journeys a day. On my main road there are 7,000 cars roaring every day. On my main orad the A22 there are tens if not hundreds of thousands. Pn the M25 well I&#8217;ll let you guess. So lets close down all the closes and cul de sac and all the little used roads in the countryside lets close them down as if they were never built in the first place. What do you think this would do to car usage? In fact this is a good idea. I&#8217;m fed up with one method being applied to one form of transport with another for another form of transport. </p>
<p>This is nothing more than tinkering so the government can have more control still blame private companies and put its cronies in charge to rip-off the taxpayer. It will never change so get used to it. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious vertical integration works for the rail industry because historically that&#8217;s how are railways were ran for over a hundred years. The SR, LNER, GWR etc&#8230; In Japan when they privatised their industry which was also nationalised like ours in the 40&#8217;s or whenever. The only difference is Japan has proper companies not franchises. It doesn&#8217;t have a separate infrastructure company that that of TOC&#8217;s </p>
<p>What is totally unacceptable is nopt the fact that our system was wrong but the complete inability of the government to do anything about it. This truly leads me to believe the government wants it like this so its cronies are in charge and can then pay themselves telephone number bonuses because they&#8217;ve improved performance by 1% or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
