<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round and Round It Goes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/round-and-round-it-goes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/round-and-round-it-goes/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martyn Read</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/round-and-round-it-goes/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martyn Read]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2004 09:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=105#comment-148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reckon a mixture would be best in some cases, return loops for most things and a set of long stub end tracks for reversing intercity workings where the train formation doesn&#039;t reverse, just the train direction. 

A couple of &#039;roundy&#039; tracks would let you do loads/empties with something like a coal train (Walsall isn&#039;t that representative, with the same loaded and empty trains running through in both directions!)

Would depend where you were modelling I guess.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon a mixture would be best in some cases, return loops for most things and a set of long stub end tracks for reversing intercity workings where the train formation doesn&#8217;t reverse, just the train direction. </p>
<p>A couple of &#8217;roundy&#8217; tracks would let you do loads/empties with something like a coal train (Walsall isn&#8217;t that representative, with the same loaded and empty trains running through in both directions!)</p>
<p>Would depend where you were modelling I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/round-and-round-it-goes/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=105#comment-147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too right those loops aren&#039;t always viable options - in a whole lifetime of layout (half)building this is the first time I&#039;ve managed to squeeze any in.  Three cheers for the dead space in the water tank area!  Eventually there will be another dumbell fiddle yard in this area, but realistically that&#039;ll be years away...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too right those loops aren&#8217;t always viable options &#8211; in a whole lifetime of layout (half)building this is the first time I&#8217;ve managed to squeeze any in.  Three cheers for the dead space in the water tank area!  Eventually there will be another dumbell fiddle yard in this area, but realistically that&#8217;ll be years away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
