<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh No, Not Again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/oh-no-not-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/oh-no-not-again/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martyn Read</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/oh-no-not-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martyn Read]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=1426#comment-1444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is annoying, it seems to have a 6 - monthly &quot;schism&quot; before settling down again.

Looks like it *might* be the end of having two large groups with the same objectives though, which was never going to be a good thing in the long term...

Ho Hum   
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is annoying, it seems to have a 6 &#8211; monthly &#8220;schism&#8221; before settling down again.</p>
<p>Looks like it *might* be the end of having two large groups with the same objectives though, which was never going to be a good thing in the long term&#8230;</p>
<p>Ho Hum   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/oh-no-not-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=1426#comment-1443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m on several other railway based mailing lists, and none of the others are as bad as this one; the problem is one of big egos and cliques.

I&#039;ve given up on music lists; I used to be on the Marillion mailing list, and that was one of the nastiest, flamiest lists I can ever remember.  It was so bad it made parts of Usenet look civilised.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on several other railway based mailing lists, and none of the others are as bad as this one; the problem is one of big egos and cliques.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve given up on music lists; I used to be on the Marillion mailing list, and that was one of the nastiest, flamiest lists I can ever remember.  It was so bad it made parts of Usenet look civilised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn S</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/oh-no-not-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynn S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=1426#comment-1442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to be a discussion group junkie - mostly music - and I&#039;ve seen just two kinds of groups: 1. Small groups in which almost the only topic is how to get more people to join; and 2. The disfunctional kind. 

It almost seems inevitable that once a group reaches a sufficient level of activity to be interesting in quickly becomes disfuntional. One group I participated in was pretty sophisticated and included not only a lot of professional musicians but also lawyers, a doctor or two, several college professors - people whom you would expect to act mature but at the slightest provocation the forum turned into a kindergarten. Ironically, the few teenagers in the group were the best behaved of all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be a discussion group junkie &#8211; mostly music &#8211; and I&#8217;ve seen just two kinds of groups: 1. Small groups in which almost the only topic is how to get more people to join; and 2. The disfunctional kind. </p>
<p>It almost seems inevitable that once a group reaches a sufficient level of activity to be interesting in quickly becomes disfuntional. One group I participated in was pretty sophisticated and included not only a lot of professional musicians but also lawyers, a doctor or two, several college professors &#8211; people whom you would expect to act mature but at the slightest provocation the forum turned into a kindergarten. Ironically, the few teenagers in the group were the best behaved of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
