<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy Birthday, NYC Subway</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/happy-birthday-nyc-subway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/happy-birthday-nyc-subway/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NRT</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/happy-birthday-nyc-subway/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NRT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2004 11:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=133#comment-195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps the MTA invests more on the high-profile tourist routes, but I was quite impressed by the subway in Manhattan last week (mainly the 5 &amp; 6 trains, if that&#039;s indicative of anything).
Perhaps $2 for a single trip is a bit pricey if one only travels a couple of blocks (so walk!), but for longer trips it&#039;s reasonable (cheaper than the same distance by bus here in Lancaster, UK), and a $7 card lasting all day pays for itself within two return trips.
I have similarly limited experience of the London Underground, but as a tourist, travelling off-peak, I&#039;d say New York&#039;s trains are about as good as London&#039;s, and New York has the edge in terms of organisation.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the MTA invests more on the high-profile tourist routes, but I was quite impressed by the subway in Manhattan last week (mainly the 5 &#038; 6 trains, if that&#8217;s indicative of anything).<br />
Perhaps $2 for a single trip is a bit pricey if one only travels a couple of blocks (so walk!), but for longer trips it&#8217;s reasonable (cheaper than the same distance by bus here in Lancaster, UK), and a $7 card lasting all day pays for itself within two return trips.<br />
I have similarly limited experience of the London Underground, but as a tourist, travelling off-peak, I&#8217;d say New York&#8217;s trains are about as good as London&#8217;s, and New York has the edge in terms of organisation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rj</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/happy-birthday-nyc-subway/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2004 02:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=133#comment-194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You took a cab from Newark to Stamford? Must&#039;ve been $200! You Limeys and your strong currency...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You took a cab from Newark to Stamford? Must&#8217;ve been $200! You Limeys and your strong currency&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gline</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/happy-birthday-nyc-subway/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gline]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 00:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=133#comment-193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MYC&#039;s subways are expensive, patchworked, crowded, overrun, infuriating, filthy, and if I had to live without them I&#039;d be heartbroken.

Funny what we get used to, isn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MYC&#8217;s subways are expensive, patchworked, crowded, overrun, infuriating, filthy, and if I had to live without them I&#8217;d be heartbroken.</p>
<p>Funny what we get used to, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
