<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Go Dapol!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/go-dapol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/go-dapol/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/go-dapol/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 08:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=243#comment-407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS: Whilst I would normally bitch like hell about duplication when there are so many gaps in the market, this isn&#039;t really duplication.  As you point out, Bachmann have had a vapour-ware 66 on their list for years now, along with almost anything else you can think of.  Difficult for anyone else to pick anything that *doesn&#039;t* conflict with one of these spoilers!

Dapol needed, IMHO, to pick a &quot;leading role&quot; loco of some description, and it seems like they&#039;ve done just that :-)

My only slight gripe is that I&#039;d say the 66 is more likely to appear from Bachmann than some of their other promises.  I wish Dapol had produced a 47 instead...




]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: Whilst I would normally bitch like hell about duplication when there are so many gaps in the market, this isn&#8217;t really duplication.  As you point out, Bachmann have had a vapour-ware 66 on their list for years now, along with almost anything else you can think of.  Difficult for anyone else to pick anything that *doesn&#8217;t* conflict with one of these spoilers!</p>
<p>Dapol needed, IMHO, to pick a &#8220;leading role&#8221; loco of some description, and it seems like they&#8217;ve done just that <img src='http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My only slight gripe is that I&#8217;d say the 66 is more likely to appear from Bachmann than some of their other promises.  I wish Dapol had produced a 47 instead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/railways/go-dapol/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 08:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=243#comment-406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crikey!  I really should read the N Gauge lists more often :-)

While I&#039;m more than keen to see Bachmann being out-run, I do hope they still produce their HAA.  This is a key wagon for me, and something both better and cheaper than the Peco offering would be purchased in great quantities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crikey!  I really should read the N Gauge lists more often <img src='http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>While I&#8217;m more than keen to see Bachmann being out-run, I do hope they still produce their HAA.  This is a key wagon for me, and something both better and cheaper than the Peco offering would be purchased in great quantities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
