<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Eurovision Song Contest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/the-eurovision-song-contest-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/the-eurovision-song-contest-2/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/the-eurovision-song-contest-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barbara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/2007/05/12/the-eurovision-song-contest-2/#comment-1935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to say Father Ted and My Lovely Horse too!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say Father Ted and My Lovely Horse too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/the-eurovision-song-contest-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 10:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/2007/05/12/the-eurovision-song-contest-2/#comment-1650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fair enough, both performances were significantly below par, the UK one more noticeably for me as I had seen them be quite slick in previous performances, even if the song was execrable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, both performances were significantly below par, the UK one more noticeably for me as I had seen them be quite slick in previous performances, even if the song was execrable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/the-eurovision-song-contest-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 17:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/2007/05/12/the-eurovision-song-contest-2/#comment-1642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure if the Irish last place was down to a mediocre song, or their shambolic underrehearsed performance.  Shades of Father Ted and &quot;My Lovely Horse&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if the Irish last place was down to a mediocre song, or their shambolic underrehearsed performance.  Shades of Father Ted and &#8220;My Lovely Horse&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/the-eurovision-song-contest-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 14:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/2007/05/12/the-eurovision-song-contest-2/#comment-1636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because the Irish entry was worse than the UK entry, and that is, I&#039;ll admit, saying something. Maybe it had some Celtic cultural and musical integrity I missed, but I doubt it. Even so, both these were better than the Armenian entry which somehow picked up points from the EUD. Dull, dull, dull.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the Irish entry was worse than the UK entry, and that is, I&#8217;ll admit, saying something. Maybe it had some Celtic cultural and musical integrity I missed, but I doubt it. Even so, both these were better than the Armenian entry which somehow picked up points from the EUD. Dull, dull, dull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
