<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prog Wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/prog-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/prog-wars/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/prog-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=338#comment-631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Wilson produced Fish (Sunsets on Empire), not Marillion themselves.  SoE is really more mainstream rock that prog, not that it isn&#039;t Fish&#039;s best album after &quot;Vigil&quot;.  SW also wrote a lot of the music.

Actually some people in the Marillion camp have been slagging off &quot;prog&quot;, to the anger of some of their older fans (the flamewars on that topic were the main reason I quit the Freaks mailing list).
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Wilson produced Fish (Sunsets on Empire), not Marillion themselves.  SoE is really more mainstream rock that prog, not that it isn&#8217;t Fish&#8217;s best album after &#8220;Vigil&#8221;.  SW also wrote a lot of the music.</p>
<p>Actually some people in the Marillion camp have been slagging off &#8220;prog&#8221;, to the anger of some of their older fans (the flamewars on that topic were the main reason I quit the Freaks mailing list).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jammiwam</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/prog-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jammiwam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=338#comment-630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any band who&#039;s music was experimental in nature and isn&#039;t shy about playing in time signatures that can&#039;t be easily danced to or writing 20 minute epic pieces could and should be deemed progresive. After all... what does the word &quot;progressive&quot; actually mean? I hope that it will continue to mean &quot;forward thinking&quot; rather than &quot;ELP, Genesis, or Yes sounding&quot;. SW &amp; Porcupine Tree are a great example of what a progressive band should be in that it doesn&#039;t even conform to the format of its own genre. Progressive is a word to describe the listeners more than it is the bands. They are what keep this music alive... and not the memory of a few twangy gems Sid Barret plunked out 40 years ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any band who&#8217;s music was experimental in nature and isn&#8217;t shy about playing in time signatures that can&#8217;t be easily danced to or writing 20 minute epic pieces could and should be deemed progresive. After all&#8230; what does the word &#8220;progressive&#8221; actually mean? I hope that it will continue to mean &#8220;forward thinking&#8221; rather than &#8220;ELP, Genesis, or Yes sounding&#8221;. SW &#038; Porcupine Tree are a great example of what a progressive band should be in that it doesn&#8217;t even conform to the format of its own genre. Progressive is a word to describe the listeners more than it is the bands. They are what keep this music alive&#8230; and not the memory of a few twangy gems Sid Barret plunked out 40 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/prog-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=338#comment-629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting. And yet, Wilson treads the same atmospheric terrain as these bands.

And he&#039;s produced Marillion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. And yet, Wilson treads the same atmospheric terrain as these bands.</p>
<p>And he&#8217;s produced Marillion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NRT</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/prog-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NRT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kalyr.co.uk/wordpress/?p=338#comment-628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember, the questioner singled-out TFK &amp; Transatlantic specifically, and SW merely responded in the same terms.  Apart from three sentences, SW seems to have been talking about contemporary &#039;prog&#039; acts in general, *for example* Transatlantic and TFK, not solely those two bands.  In the context of comments he&#039;s been making for years, it&#039;s not personal criticism of Stardust-Flower Stolt.

Why condemn?  Because lazy journalists and the general public associate the truly progressive bands with regressive &#039;prog&#039; clones of 70s bands (which were bad enough then, never mind regurgitated now) - they&#039;re not aware of a distinction.  Hence, I genuinely believe the existence of such bands has harmed the careers of progressive (not &#039;prog&#039;!) bands like Porcupine Tree.

As I sort-of said in the main piece, I like Transatlantic (not TFK), but I don&#039;t think their music has *value* (whatever that means!).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, the questioner singled-out TFK &#038; Transatlantic specifically, and SW merely responded in the same terms.  Apart from three sentences, SW seems to have been talking about contemporary &#8216;prog&#8217; acts in general, *for example* Transatlantic and TFK, not solely those two bands.  In the context of comments he&#8217;s been making for years, it&#8217;s not personal criticism of Stardust-Flower Stolt.</p>
<p>Why condemn?  Because lazy journalists and the general public associate the truly progressive bands with regressive &#8216;prog&#8217; clones of 70s bands (which were bad enough then, never mind regurgitated now) &#8211; they&#8217;re not aware of a distinction.  Hence, I genuinely believe the existence of such bands has harmed the careers of progressive (not &#8216;prog&#8217;!) bands like Porcupine Tree.</p>
<p>As I sort-of said in the main piece, I like Transatlantic (not TFK), but I don&#8217;t think their music has *value* (whatever that means!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
