<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Reviews (again)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/on-reviews-again-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/on-reviews-again-2/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/on-reviews-again-2/comment-page-1/#comment-34719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9225#comment-34719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ought to stress that those weren&#039;t anyone&#039;s exact words, but that was the implication.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ought to stress that those weren&#8217;t anyone&#8217;s exact words, but that was the implication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulE</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/on-reviews-again-2/comment-page-1/#comment-34710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9225#comment-34710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Duty as a fan is to be uncritically supportive&quot; - Sounds more like a cult. And people will assume that the reviews should be read as advertising if there is no evidence of critical thinking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Duty as a fan is to be uncritically supportive&#8221; &#8211; Sounds more like a cult. And people will assume that the reviews should be read as advertising if there is no evidence of critical thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/on-reviews-again-2/comment-page-1/#comment-34649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2013 21:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9225#comment-34649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed. I&#039;m always apprehensive whenever I publish a review for an artist I know personally, because I never know how they&#039;ll react.

On one hand I&#039;ve had artists telling me they want honest feedback that tells they how they can improve their act. On the other I&#039;ve had people telling me my duty as a fan is to be uncritically supportive at all times.

And I need to be careful what I say, because artists read the comments as well...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. I&#8217;m always apprehensive whenever I publish a review for an artist I know personally, because I never know how they&#8217;ll react.</p>
<p>On one hand I&#8217;ve had artists telling me they want honest feedback that tells they how they can improve their act. On the other I&#8217;ve had people telling me my duty as a fan is to be uncritically supportive at all times.</p>
<p>And I need to be careful what I say, because artists read the comments as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thor lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/on-reviews-again-2/comment-page-1/#comment-34244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thor lawrence]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 14:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9225#comment-34244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It does not help that many can not read a text diplomatically -- i.e. considering the meaning and context -- and so they ignore nuances and possible alternative interpretations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does not help that many can not read a text diplomatically &#8212; i.e. considering the meaning and context &#8212; and so they ignore nuances and possible alternative interpretations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/on-reviews-again-2/comment-page-1/#comment-34202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9225#comment-34202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to honest reviews, there&#039;s a difference between being very negative towards something you strongly dislike, and offering constructive feedback in response to something which is good but could have been better.

In a small and incestuous fandom the former is something I&#039;d never do. If someone from the UK club-level progressive rock scene made a record as bad as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/record-reviews/a-death-metal-christmas/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Death Metal Christmas&lt;/a&gt; I would probably just ignore it, at least on public forums.

&lt;em&gt;(Edit - meant &quot;former&quot;, not &quot;latter&quot;)&lt;/em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to honest reviews, there&#8217;s a difference between being very negative towards something you strongly dislike, and offering constructive feedback in response to something which is good but could have been better.</p>
<p>In a small and incestuous fandom the former is something I&#8217;d never do. If someone from the UK club-level progressive rock scene made a record as bad as <a href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/record-reviews/a-death-metal-christmas/" rel="nofollow">Death Metal Christmas</a> I would probably just ignore it, at least on public forums.</p>
<p><em>(Edit &#8211; meant &#8220;former&#8221;, not &#8220;latter&#8221;)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/on-reviews-again-2/comment-page-1/#comment-34199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9225#comment-34199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah. When something stinks, it stinks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. When something stinks, it stinks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serdar Yegulalp</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/on-reviews-again-2/comment-page-1/#comment-34198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Serdar Yegulalp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=9225#comment-34198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In some fandoms, being honest with your reviews -- calling a fan darling out for what it is, for instance -- is often seen as being bad form. I wondered why, until one day another fan put it this way: When a given fandom is embattled and small to begin with, it&#039;s our duty to support even the parts of it we don&#039;t like for the sake of the health of the fandom as a whole. I couldn&#039;t disagree more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some fandoms, being honest with your reviews &#8212; calling a fan darling out for what it is, for instance &#8212; is often seen as being bad form. I wondered why, until one day another fan put it this way: When a given fandom is embattled and small to begin with, it&#8217;s our duty to support even the parts of it we don&#8217;t like for the sake of the health of the fandom as a whole. I couldn&#8217;t disagree more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
