<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revenue Streams vs. Promotional Channels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/revenue-streams-vs-promotional-channels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/revenue-streams-vs-promotional-channels/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/revenue-streams-vs-promotional-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-20857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=5537#comment-20857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the major labels, that was as much a feature as it was a bug. Maximising sales of the smallest possible roster of artists was (briefly) a very profitable business model for them. 

I&#039;m sure they hate the way the internet has fragmented the market. Which, I fear gives them little motivation to encourage digital services intended as discovery channels, and too much motivation to stifle them through overpriced licencing and royalty demands.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the major labels, that was as much a feature as it was a bug. Maximising sales of the smallest possible roster of artists was (briefly) a very profitable business model for them. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they hate the way the internet has fragmented the market. Which, I fear gives them little motivation to encourage digital services intended as discovery channels, and too much motivation to stifle them through overpriced licencing and royalty demands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulE</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/revenue-streams-vs-promotional-channels/comment-page-1/#comment-20855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=5537#comment-20855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will this happen if the major labels fail to see that the pre-digital market was fundamentally undermined by the public only being able to hear a small proportion of releases on mainstream radio?  So many people copied onto tape that opposition to internet piracy can seem like blatant hypocracy - even when it is self evident that paying for music enables the artist to work on more. I&#039;m quite happy to pay full price for artists I already know - or are recommended by a trusted source, but some system of free access on demand is the only way to go beyond those limits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will this happen if the major labels fail to see that the pre-digital market was fundamentally undermined by the public only being able to hear a small proportion of releases on mainstream radio?  So many people copied onto tape that opposition to internet piracy can seem like blatant hypocracy &#8211; even when it is self evident that paying for music enables the artist to work on more. I&#8217;m quite happy to pay full price for artists I already know &#8211; or are recommended by a trusted source, but some system of free access on demand is the only way to go beyond those limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
