<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Noel Gallagher, The Gift That Keeps On Giving</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/noel-gallagher-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/noel-gallagher-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synthetase</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/noel-gallagher-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-74355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Synthetase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=13978#comment-74355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh for sure. I mean, he&#039;s good, but so what? Not the be all and end all of a band or a great song.

Another thing that I think is worth considering between the sound of pro and amateur guitarists is that pros are usually playing beautiful very high quality instruments that (and I think this is the most important part) are well set-up and maintained. Obviously a good player can make a crappy guitar sound good, but it&#039;s amazing what a great set-up will do for your sound.

I&#039;m also not a fan of Dream Theater. I don&#039;t like the way they chop and change so abruptly. It&#039;s like they play a couple of bars of this then a couple of bars of that just because they can. There never seems to be any rhyme or reason to it. Contrast that with something like Shine on You Crazy Diamond, where each part of the song bleeds into the next part gradually and almost (I hate to say it) organically. There&#039;s a world of difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh for sure. I mean, he&#8217;s good, but so what? Not the be all and end all of a band or a great song.</p>
<p>Another thing that I think is worth considering between the sound of pro and amateur guitarists is that pros are usually playing beautiful very high quality instruments that (and I think this is the most important part) are well set-up and maintained. Obviously a good player can make a crappy guitar sound good, but it&#8217;s amazing what a great set-up will do for your sound.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not a fan of Dream Theater. I don&#8217;t like the way they chop and change so abruptly. It&#8217;s like they play a couple of bars of this then a couple of bars of that just because they can. There never seems to be any rhyme or reason to it. Contrast that with something like Shine on You Crazy Diamond, where each part of the song bleeds into the next part gradually and almost (I hate to say it) organically. There&#8217;s a world of difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/noel-gallagher-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-74340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=13978#comment-74340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even when a song only has four chords, it does help if the guitarist can hit those chords cleanly and have a halfway-decent tone. Which to be fair Gallagher could do.

As for virtuosity, it&#039;s a means to an end, not an end in itself, one reason I&#039;ve never been as big a Dream Theater fanboy as some people I know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even when a song only has four chords, it does help if the guitarist can hit those chords cleanly and have a halfway-decent tone. Which to be fair Gallagher could do.</p>
<p>As for virtuosity, it&#8217;s a means to an end, not an end in itself, one reason I&#8217;ve never been as big a Dream Theater fanboy as some people I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synthetase</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/noel-gallagher-the-gift-that-keeps-on-giving/comment-page-1/#comment-74278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Synthetase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2015 10:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=13978#comment-74278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Gallagher for real or is he just trolling? Does he think he&#039;s Gilmour or something? I know he had a reputation for being a bit of an ego in the 90s, but that was twenty years ago. You&#039;d think he&#039;d grow up eventually.

The funny thing about being a brilliant guitarist - often it&#039;s completely irrelevant. I can think of heaps of great songs that any beginner guitarist should be able to knock out after a bit of practice. Just because it&#039;s hard to play doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Gallagher for real or is he just trolling? Does he think he&#8217;s Gilmour or something? I know he had a reputation for being a bit of an ego in the 90s, but that was twenty years ago. You&#8217;d think he&#8217;d grow up eventually.</p>
<p>The funny thing about being a brilliant guitarist &#8211; often it&#8217;s completely irrelevant. I can think of heaps of great songs that any beginner guitarist should be able to knock out after a bit of practice. Just because it&#8217;s hard to play doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
