http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/a-model-for-streaming/ The blogs of Tim Hall Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41 http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/a-model-for-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-72569 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:25:58 +0000 http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=13190#comment-72569 Same here. Streaming is fine for discovery (and that ought to be it’s main purpose), but music I love I want to own. And be sure the artist gets the lion’s share of my money.

]]> http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/a-model-for-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-72568 Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:08:34 +0000 http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=13190#comment-72568 Exactly. Plenty of us already spend fifty or more a month on music, but if I don’t buy anything for a few months I can still listen to the CDs I already have.

]]> http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/music/music-opinion/a-model-for-streaming/comment-page-1/#comment-72515 Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:31:18 +0000 http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=13190#comment-72515 Something along these lines with payment transparency must be the way for artists. I would not pay 50 a month either. Not to “rent”. I might sometimes pay at that rate to “buy”. But then I can hold off buying for a time and continue to listen.

]]>