<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Censorship: Incompetence or Malice?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/twitter-censorship-incompetence-or-malice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/twitter-censorship-incompetence-or-malice/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/twitter-censorship-incompetence-or-malice/comment-page-1/#comment-80649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=16750#comment-80649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going by some of the names on the &quot;Trust and Safety Council&quot;, which didn&#039;t appeat to include much in the way of civil liberties or press freedom advocates. 

The consensus on Twitter is these suspensions are made by an algorithm which tries to identify bad users based on statistical analysis of word use and follower/following patterns, and it&#039;s generating a lot of false positives. Which is probably the wrong solution to the wrong problem.  Twitter should be better at keeping different groups who won&#039;t play nice in the same sandbox apart.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going by some of the names on the &#8220;Trust and Safety Council&#8221;, which didn&#8217;t appeat to include much in the way of civil liberties or press freedom advocates. </p>
<p>The consensus on Twitter is these suspensions are made by an algorithm which tries to identify bad users based on statistical analysis of word use and follower/following patterns, and it&#8217;s generating a lot of false positives. Which is probably the wrong solution to the wrong problem.  Twitter should be better at keeping different groups who won&#8217;t play nice in the same sandbox apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObjectiveReality</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/twitter-censorship-incompetence-or-malice/comment-page-1/#comment-80641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ObjectiveReality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=16750#comment-80641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TBH I don&#039;t know that this is &quot;left-authoritarianism&quot; so much as it is &quot;freaking out after letting your service turn into a totally unmoderated cesspool and attempting to claw back some sense of &#039;doing something&#039; by hitting all the soft targets at once.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TBH I don&#8217;t know that this is &#8220;left-authoritarianism&#8221; so much as it is &#8220;freaking out after letting your service turn into a totally unmoderated cesspool and attempting to claw back some sense of &#8216;doing something&#8217; by hitting all the soft targets at once.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
