<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Social Networking Work Like Email?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/should-social-networking-work-like-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/should-social-networking-work-like-email/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/should-social-networking-work-like-email/comment-page-1/#comment-27603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=6943#comment-27603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, it wouldn&#039;t be hard to implement a social network-alike on top of Wordpress and other blogging platforms. RSS is already there, all it needs is plugins to support posting comments through third-party clients. Which may be the point where the spam issue raises it&#039;s ugly head.

Although I do think the spam issue is managable. Askmet (which really is a vital part of the Wordpress ecosystem) works well enough to keep a lid on spam as far as this blog is concerned (it was a real pain back in the days when I still used Moveable Type). And this blog has been around more than a decade, and has thousands of posts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it wouldn&#8217;t be hard to implement a social network-alike on top of WordPress and other blogging platforms. RSS is already there, all it needs is plugins to support posting comments through third-party clients. Which may be the point where the spam issue raises it&#8217;s ugly head.</p>
<p>Although I do think the spam issue is managable. Askmet (which really is a vital part of the WordPress ecosystem) works well enough to keep a lid on spam as far as this blog is concerned (it was a real pain back in the days when I still used Moveable Type). And this blog has been around more than a decade, and has thousands of posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Cravens</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/should-social-networking-work-like-email/comment-page-1/#comment-27602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl Cravens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=6943#comment-27602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something I&#039;ve lamented for awhile... the net was built on open protocols and ubiquitous services that anyone could run a server to provide. Those days are mostly gone.

I&#039;ve often wondered if a Twitter-like service could run on a network of independently-run servers. Something like email or NNTP. But spam has made it difficult to trust... how do you protect the network of trusted servers without making it very hard to get a new server in? This is exactly the problem with mail... there is no trust mechanism and anyone can set up a server and start sending mail, add it had to be received by the rest of the network. But as a mail server operator. I&#039;d hate to pay an expensive license or jump through onerous hoops to get accepted into the network.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something I&#8217;ve lamented for awhile&#8230; the net was built on open protocols and ubiquitous services that anyone could run a server to provide. Those days are mostly gone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often wondered if a Twitter-like service could run on a network of independently-run servers. Something like email or NNTP. But spam has made it difficult to trust&#8230; how do you protect the network of trusted servers without making it very hard to get a new server in? This is exactly the problem with mail&#8230; there is no trust mechanism and anyone can set up a server and start sending mail, add it had to be received by the rest of the network. But as a mail server operator. I&#8217;d hate to pay an expensive license or jump through onerous hoops to get accepted into the network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/should-social-networking-work-like-email/comment-page-1/#comment-27600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=6943#comment-27600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sort of thing I&#039;d like to see: 

When you post something online, you think more of &quot;Which groups of people do you want to see (or not see) this&quot; rather than &quot;Which networks shall I post this on&quot;. Similarly when reading posts, you sort and filter based on who it&#039;s from, and what it&#039;s about rather than where it&#039;s posted.

That might improve the signal-to-noise ratio if it means we stop seeing the same updates cross-posted to multiple networks, as happens a lot at the moment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sort of thing I&#8217;d like to see: </p>
<p>When you post something online, you think more of &#8220;Which groups of people do you want to see (or not see) this&#8221; rather than &#8220;Which networks shall I post this on&#8221;. Similarly when reading posts, you sort and filter based on who it&#8217;s from, and what it&#8217;s about rather than where it&#8217;s posted.</p>
<p>That might improve the signal-to-noise ratio if it means we stop seeing the same updates cross-posted to multiple networks, as happens a lot at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/should-social-networking-work-like-email/comment-page-1/#comment-27598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=6943#comment-27598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be interested to see that. Is it based around any existing open standards (like RSS?).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see that. Is it based around any existing open standards (like RSS?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Crowther</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/should-social-networking-work-like-email/comment-page-1/#comment-27595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Crowther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=6943#comment-27595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes.  Absolutely critical.  I have a workable architecture, though I need someone to eyeball it for security.  Give me 2-3 good programmers and a year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  Absolutely critical.  I have a workable architecture, though I need someone to eyeball it for security.  Give me 2-3 good programmers and a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/should-social-networking-work-like-email/comment-page-1/#comment-27583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=6943#comment-27583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ditto App.net, although it&#039;s day may still come. I suppose it&#039;s a bit chicken-and-egg. At the moment, any new network either needs a critical mass of users or needs to be able to import content from elsewhere. Maybe it&#039;s just too late, and the propietary silos have won.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto App.net, although it&#8217;s day may still come. I suppose it&#8217;s a bit chicken-and-egg. At the moment, any new network either needs a critical mass of users or needs to be able to import content from elsewhere. Maybe it&#8217;s just too late, and the propietary silos have won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serdar Yegulalp</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/should-social-networking-work-like-email/comment-page-1/#comment-27582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Serdar Yegulalp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=6943#comment-27582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Diaspora* was supposed to be the open-API answer to the walled garden, but it doesn&#039;t seem to have gone anywhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diaspora* was supposed to be the open-API answer to the walled garden, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to have gone anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
