<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Pivoting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/is-twitter-pivoting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/is-twitter-pivoting/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/is-twitter-pivoting/comment-page-1/#comment-19875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=5440#comment-19875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter can be a bit of a time-sink if you&#039;re not careful, although Facebook is far worse (One reason why I periodically take time-outs from the place).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter can be a bit of a time-sink if you&#8217;re not careful, although Facebook is far worse (One reason why I periodically take time-outs from the place).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Orton</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/is-twitter-pivoting/comment-page-1/#comment-19873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Orton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=5440#comment-19873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking about setting up a twitter account just so I could listen to Tower Bridge.  But that feed went commercial before I got round to signing up.
Incidents with celebrities making sponsored tweets have done nothing to increase my enthusiasm for the system,
But then, I don&#039;t suppose I would have followed the tweeters concerned, so I doubt I would have noticed them.
I am pushed for time to read my email.  I do not have time for much else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about setting up a twitter account just so I could listen to Tower Bridge.  But that feed went commercial before I got round to signing up.<br />
Incidents with celebrities making sponsored tweets have done nothing to increase my enthusiasm for the system,<br />
But then, I don&#8217;t suppose I would have followed the tweeters concerned, so I doubt I would have noticed them.<br />
I am pushed for time to read my email.  I do not have time for much else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/is-twitter-pivoting/comment-page-1/#comment-19815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 13:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=5440#comment-19815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find Twitter is something you dip into and skim rather than trying to read everything, and the text-based nature is therefore on of Twitter&#039;s big strengths.

This is why I really don&#039;t like the idea of some of the rumoured changes.  Pictures and videos displayed in the timeline by default is going to clutter things badly and just add cruft.

Worst-case scenario is the sort of passive-aggressive visual spam than clutters up Facebook. When I clicked on the &quot;Discover&quot; tab, the first thing I saw was a bloody Someecard containing a lame platitude. I took that as a very bad omen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Twitter is something you dip into and skim rather than trying to read everything, and the text-based nature is therefore on of Twitter&#8217;s big strengths.</p>
<p>This is why I really don&#8217;t like the idea of some of the rumoured changes.  Pictures and videos displayed in the timeline by default is going to clutter things badly and just add cruft.</p>
<p>Worst-case scenario is the sort of passive-aggressive visual spam than clutters up Facebook. When I clicked on the &#8220;Discover&#8221; tab, the first thing I saw was a bloody Someecard containing a lame platitude. I took that as a very bad omen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serdar</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/is-twitter-pivoting/comment-page-1/#comment-19780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Serdar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=5440#comment-19780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It goes back into something I&#039;ve said many times before: &quot;If you don&#039;t own it, don&#039;t build on it.&quot;

Twitter for me is something I use mostly to catch the ear of other people who use it. I&#039;ve tried staying on top of the gush of stuff that comes through it, but the inherent unfilterability of so much of what comes through it makes it a losing proposition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It goes back into something I&#8217;ve said many times before: &#8220;If you don&#8217;t own it, don&#8217;t build on it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Twitter for me is something I use mostly to catch the ear of other people who use it. I&#8217;ve tried staying on top of the gush of stuff that comes through it, but the inherent unfilterability of so much of what comes through it makes it a losing proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
