<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook&#8217;s New Look &#8211; A Tester&#8217;s Perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/facebooks-new-look-a-testers-perspective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/facebooks-new-look-a-testers-perspective/</link>
	<description>The blogs of Tim Hall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 23:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/facebooks-new-look-a-testers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-14137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Hall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=3724#comment-14137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the level of outrage I&#039;m seeing over privacy (relating to that awful &quot;news ticker&quot; which everybody hates), I&#039;m not sure what&#039;s worse. Zuckerberg&#039;s cavalier approach towards people&#039;s private data, or some people&#039;s completely unrealistic expectations of security. 

There are people who want to be able to post very personal things that should only ever be shared with a closed group of trusted friends, yet still seem to expect everyone else but them to take responsibility for shielding them from the consequences if their mum, boss or psycho ex reads that comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the level of outrage I&#8217;m seeing over privacy (relating to that awful &#8220;news ticker&#8221; which everybody hates), I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s worse. Zuckerberg&#8217;s cavalier approach towards people&#8217;s private data, or some people&#8217;s completely unrealistic expectations of security. </p>
<p>There are people who want to be able to post very personal things that should only ever be shared with a closed group of trusted friends, yet still seem to expect everyone else but them to take responsibility for shielding them from the consequences if their mum, boss or psycho ex reads that comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flightless</title>
		<link>http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/computing/social-media/facebooks-new-look-a-testers-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-14135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flightless]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kalyr.co.uk/weblog/?p=3724#comment-14135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a non computer nerd a problem I have with facebook is that each new version seems designed to make it easier to use people on it as a free market research tool.

I also get the feeling that I&#039;m using it in a way the providers don&#039;t intend. I want to use it to talk to/ find out about people that I already know face to face. I don&#039;t want to use it as a race to get an infinite amount of &#039;friends&#039; that I&#039;ve not met socially but who just happen to like the same prog bands as me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a non computer nerd a problem I have with facebook is that each new version seems designed to make it easier to use people on it as a free market research tool.</p>
<p>I also get the feeling that I&#8217;m using it in a way the providers don&#8217;t intend. I want to use it to talk to/ find out about people that I already know face to face. I don&#8217;t want to use it as a race to get an infinite amount of &#8216;friends&#8217; that I&#8217;ve not met socially but who just happen to like the same prog bands as me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
