Author Archives: Tim Hall

Manchester Blogmeet 2006

I’ve just about recovered from the Manchester Blogmeet, organised by Claire. It started at the Kro Bar in Piccadilly Gardens. Something like 30 people turned up, including Norm.

A smaller and more select group moved on to Efe’s Turkish restraunt in St Peter’s Square, actually more broadly Mediterranean than just Turkish, with a lot of Greek and Italian food on the menu. Finally ended up at Mother Mac’s, a small old-fashioned pub hidden away in a back alley.

As is usual at such events, someone insists on bringing a digital camera to take embarrasing pictures of me. Chern Jie was that person.

A great time was had by all; although I apologise for bringing up the subject of toilets, which set Claire off on a long rant about toilets and bodily functions. Now I’ll actually have to blogroll all the blogs of the people who were there.

As an aside, the Kro Bar gets a black mark for failing to serve Leffe in the proper shaped glass, using instead something more appropriately shaped for orange juice. Presumably the Belgians will declare a fatwa over this.

Posted in Miscellaneous | 7 Comments

Lotus Notes, we still hate you

A long while ago I linked to post by The Gline about how the existence of Lotus Notes was a symbol of the wrong sort corporate culture.

Today, The Guardian has an article on the survival of this horrid piece of software, linking to the Lotus Notes Sucks site.

Why do users hate Notes so much? And why, then, do they use it? The answers illuminate a typical process when companies buy “enterprise” software: the people who choose a product tend not to be the ones who use it.

It goes on to describe how the hostile user-interface seems to come from a parallel universe where neither Windows, Apple Macs or The Internet existed,

It quotes Ben Rose, leader of the Notes User Group, who makes an very lame attempt to defend the awful, crufty email interface.

“Email is quite inefficient. People like to ‘Reply To All’ and send copies of attachments to each other, instead of doing what Notes does, which is to have a single copy on the server that everyone sees.”

In other words, we deliberately made our email functionality crap, so that people wouldn’t use it unless they absolutely had to. Last time I used it, Lotus notes is especially hostile towards Internet mailing lists, because it refused to allow users to do anything *other* than top-post. And you thought Outlook sucked….

I worked for a company that used Lotus Notes as it’s corporate standard. We didn’t make much use of the allegedly wonderful collaberative stuff, only the cruddy email client. After it all went pear-shaped, the CEO ended up doing jail time for fraud. I’m not sure what that says about Lotus Notes.

Posted in Miscellaneous | Tagged | 6 Comments

Pay-to-spam?

Spam is the big scourge of the internet. Spammers are increasingly from organised crime rather than the small-time scam artists of a few years back. And they’re allegedly raking in large sums of money from people stupid enough to fall for their scams. Are AOL and Yahoo looking to get a piece of the action with their new Pay-to-spam scheme?

AOL and Yahoo plan to charge fees of up to one cent (US) per message to those that sign up for the service.

Paying the fees means that messages will not go through spam filters, are guaranteed to arrive and will bear a stamp of authenticity.

Both AOL and Yahoo said they would start offering the service within the next few months.

I can’t help feeling this is not going to be a good thing. This will mean most end-users receiving *more* spam, not less. Only this time from big business rather than Florida-based crooks.

It could easily make life a lot harder for small mailing discussion lists (i.e. anything other than Yahoo’s own yahoogroups). I can see them making their spam filters more and more aggressive, and respond with ‘pay up’.

It could well accelerate the decline of mailing lists in favour of the inexplicably fashionable slow clunky web-boards with their all their graphical cruft and stupid avatars.

This is a bad idea, that deserves to be strangled at birth.

Update: A Yahoo PR flack in the comments claims that my fears are groundless. But the Electronic Frontier Foundation seem to echo what I’ve been saying.

Email readers and senders will both lose, because the incentives for Yahoo, AOL, and Goodmail are all wrong. Their service is only valuable if it “saves” you from their spam filters. In turn, they have an incentive to treat more of your email as spam, and thereby “encouraging” people to sign up.

Even email senders who just want to reach Dad@aol.com may eventually be in trouble. Once a pay-to-speak system like this gets going, it will be increasing difficult for people who don’t pay to get their mail through. The system has no way to distinguish between ordinary mail and bulk mail, spam and non-spam, personal and commercial mail. It just gives preference to people who pay.

And prepare to be shaken down if you run a noncommercial mailing list, whether for local bowling leagues or political organizations with a national membership. Not only will the per-message fees quickly add up, but the Goodmail technology will be costly for senders to setup and use. Goodmail’s giving a “special offer” for nonprofits through 2006, but, when that ends, their messages will presumably end up in the trash, too.

Posted in Miscellaneous | 4 Comments

Gaming, not Blogging.

Blogging has been light lately. I’ve given I higher priority to the online games I run, the Dreamlyrics games KLR and AEF, and my PBeM on The Phoenyx, Kalyr.

Some of this effort was spent chasing up players who had gone AWOL. Fortunately I managed to track three of them down, and persuaded them to post.

Posted in Games | 1 Comment

Manchester Blogmeet!

There’s a Blogmeet in Manchester next weekend! Organised by Claire Sudbury, there’s already a day-long agenda.

Part 1 – Tea and Cakes.
3pm onwards in Kro Bar, Piccadilly Gardens (across the grass from the disappearing fountains).

I did a cake test. These guys do the best cake by far. Felix (aged three-and-a-half) agrees. They’re also very handy for people arriving on trains.

(Part 1.5)
(we might do a little tour of Manchester in between cakes and proper food, but that’ll be an ad hoc affair)

Part 2 – Proper Food.
7.30pm (table booked) at Efe’s Turkish restaurant on St Peter’s Square. It’s in the little row of shops opposite the library (striking circular building).

The food is inexpensive, quite varied, and good. I’ve eaten here several times. Not particularly adventurous, but a safe bet when catering for unknown tastes.
Give me a nod if you’re considering this. I’ve booked a table, but I need to check on numbers. I don’t need firm commitments, just an approximate idea.

Part 3 – Drinks.
9.30pm onwards at “Mother Mac’s” pub, Back Piccadilly, off Oldham St.

Small, peaceful, friendly. Crucially you can get a quiet drink in here on a Saturday night, which is a bit amazing for the city centre. Probably because it’s well hidden down a back street. And it’s a proper pub with proper prices, rather than a too-shiny too-expensive see-and-be-seen noise-fest.

It looks like there will be a better turnout that the meetup.com meets of a couple of years ago. I hope Norm will be there.

Posted in Miscellaneous | Comments Off

No Musical Express

The NME has come up with their annual list of best albums of all time.

1. The Stone Roses The Stone Roses
2. The Smiths The Queen Is Dead
3. Oasis Definitely Maybe
4. Sex Pistols Never Mind The Bollocks
5. Arctic Monkeys Whatever People Say I Am, That’s What I’m Not
6. Blur Modern Life Is Rubbish
7. Pulp Different Class
8. The Clash London Calling
9. The Beatles Revolver
10. The Libertines Up The Bracket

Much as I would have expected, it says more about the NME than it does about any artist on the list. Are they really saying that the flavour-of-the-month Arctic Monkeys are better than The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, David Bowie or Pink Floyd?

One thing to remember is that the NME doesn’t represent anything like the whole of British rock, but just those bands that fit a very narrow template of what they think rock should be. The great tragedy is that the NME has had far too much influence over what new music gets exposure; they have the same malign influence over UK music as corporate commercial radio has in the US.

The other thing to remember is that Britain’s baby boom was a decade later than America’s, and came of age during the punk era in the late 70s. Just like America’s boomers they’ve mistaken stupid generational prejudices for eternal truths.

This explains the lack of late 60s/early 70s artists in the list; they represented everything that was completely out of fashion way back in 1977. Later generations of NME hacks seemed to absorb these prejuduces by osmosis. For example, anything connected with 70s prog-rock is dismissed with derision; which is why you’ll never see Pink Floyd or Led Zeppelin on any NME list.

Saying that, the list is stupid even by NME standards; the ridiculously over-hyped Arctic Monkeys only released their album a week ago!

Posted in Music | 4 Comments

Hurting Wrong Fun

I’ve always had mixed feelings about The Forge. On one hand, they’ve got some very good ideas about game design, particularly when it comes to questioning assumptions and sacred cows. And they have come up with some interesting games. On the other hand, they do sometimes come over as insufferable elitists.

But when Ron Edwards comes up with something like this, I do have to wonder if it’s still possible to take him seriously. Is he becoming the Sid Vicious of RPGs?

I’ll say this: that protagonism was so badly injured during the history of role-playing (1970-ish through the present, with the height of the effect being the early 1990s), that participants in that hobby are perhaps the very last people on earth who could be expected to produce *all* the components of a functional story. No, the most functional among them can only be counted on to seize protagonism in their stump-fingered hands and scream protectively. You can tag Sorcerer with this diagnosis, instantly.

[The most damaged participants are too horrible even to look upon, much less to describe. This has nothing to do with geekery. When I say "brain damage," I mean it literally. Their minds have been *harmed.*]

The structure of lumpley.com makes it difficult for me to determine the context in which Ron made those comments. But it did result in a further posting by Vincent Baker

The purpose of this blog is to judge people’s fun. We begin by judging our own fun, but in doing so we will and always will judge others’ fun too.

I hold standards of quality to be independent of individual tastes. Accordingly, everyone who participates here must do so with the understanding that the fun that suits their individual tastes might be called crappy, broken, lame, sucky, wimpy, stupid, or even pathalogical. You may feel free to defend your favorite fun if you’re so moved, but you should do so in terms of its objective quality, without falling back upon “everyone likes what they like,” “all tastes are equal,” or “judging my fun makes you an elitist.”

I expect each of you to have the self-understanding and emotional maturity to make your own decisions about your participation here, given this. My experience so far has overwhelmingly borne this out, and I expect this post to make the process only easier for us all.

Which is why I’m responding on my own blog, where I set the rules. I think Ron Edwards’ post is a blatant troll, and I have every right to take offence at the idea that I’m somehow ‘brain damaged’ by the fact that I enjoy ‘simulationist’ style games. While I’ve also enjoyed Forge-inspired games like ‘Primetime Adventures’, Ron Edwards’ hubris-filled attitude is likely to make me take Forgeite-Narrativist stuff less seriously.

(Link from The Phoenyx Gamers List)

Posted in Games | 11 Comments

Graham Farish in 2006

Graham Farish have announced What’s New for 2006.

  • BR 3MT Standard 2-6-2 Tank
  • LMS Jubilee
  • Class 04 Diesel Shunter
  • Class 150 DMU
  • LMS Stanier coaches (5 types)
  • OBA Open
  • Bogie Bolster “C”
  • TTA 4-wheel Oil Tank
  • POA Open “box”
  • 12t Ventilated Van
  • “Seacow” bogie ballast wagon
  • New 40′ and 20′ containers for the freightliner flat

On paper (or electrons), it’s an impressive list. But when you consider that many of the promised 2005 items have yet to materialise, it makes we wonder when, or perhaps even if, we’ll see all these items. Past experience has made me cynical; the class 60 locomotive has been in the catalogue for something like three years, and the 66 took almost the same length of time to appear before Dapol forced their hand.

Some of them are predictable shrinkings of their 00 range. I find the TTA particularly welcome; the existing Peco model is getting very long in the tooth now, and isn’t available in any modern liveries.

One can’t help but notice that several items, including the 04, the 150, the Stanier coaches and the Seacow were once proposed by Dapol, and I can only assume this is payback for the 66. Dapol have since announced that they’re going to abandon these models in the light of the Farish announcements. It’s also been said that they’d done little or no work so far on them, so haven’t wasted a lot of money.

Posted in Railways | Comments Off

Swiss Kettle!

Blonay-Chamby Steam Railway

Specially for Michael, a shot of the Blonay-Chamby steam railway in Switzerland, taken last summer. The train stopped just before the bridge, and they let those of us with cameras disembark, troop along the narrow walkway, and photograph the train slowly puffing across the viaduct. The Health and Safety Commision would have kittens if any British preserved line attempted something like that!

The metre-gauge Blonay-Chamby line runs for about three miles in the hills above Lake Geneva, with connections at both ends to other metre-gauge lines. The line closed and was taken over by preservationists in the 1960s, and they retained the overhead electrification, which is still live, as they also run a lot of preserved electric railcars.

The loco is an ex Furka Oberalp rack-and-adhesion 2-6-0T, although there are no rack sections on this line.

Posted in Railways | 1 Comment

IÄ!

Dave links to the application of Occrams Razor to the theory of Intelligent Design, and comes to the only possible squamous and rugose conclusion.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off