Editing draft blog posts or reviews prior to publication seems to be a matter of breaking up over-long and convoluted run-on sentences. Does this mean my writing is too prog?
-
Recent Comments
- dr wart hoover on What Plandampf Should Be Next?
- Michael on Talking Dolls are Privacy Risks?
- Synthetase on Talking Dolls are Privacy Risks?
- John Hunt on Eurostar Refurbishment
- Michael on Talking Dolls are Privacy Risks?
- PaulE on The Cost of Being Creative
- Synthetase on The Cost of Being Creative
- Michael on The Cost of Being Creative
- Tim Hall on The Cost of Being Creative
- Synthetase on The Cost of Being Creative
- Tim Hall on GitLab’s Database Outage Postmortem
- Synthetase on Talking Dolls are Privacy Risks?
-
Meta
I’d say your writing is more like a folk-acid ska mixture, with some overtones of neoclassical.
Is there such a thing? There is probably a musical equvalent to Rule 43, so there probably is.
What’s wrong with being prog? Were your epistles to become wandering and repetitive addresses to the the gathered multitude of adoring disciples of your utterances attentively waiting with communal bated breath, one might possibly request that you reconsider some of your epistolary art such that the audience does not become overwhelmed and be unable to appreciate the sheer unadulterated glory of your thinking. Else keep it short.
Yrs
Thor
If you write like that, then Twitter is not for you….